Can I run QwQ-32B on a GeForce RTX 3050?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of QwQ-32B fits GeForce RTX 3050 at any context we compute, with q4_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 7.16 GiB in weights alone, against 5.58 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 122.07 GiB | 123.3 | 123.5 | 124.1 | 125.2 | 127.5 | 132.0 |
| Q8_0 | 32.43 GiB | 33.6 | 33.9 | 34.5 | 35.6 | 37.8 | 42.3 |
| Q6_K | 25.04 GiB | 26.2 | 26.5 | 27.1 | 28.2 | 30.4 | 34.9 |
| Q5_K_M | 21.66 GiB | 22.8 | 23.1 | 23.7 | 24.8 | 27.1 | 31.6 |
| Q5_0 | 21.08 GiB | 22.3 | 22.5 | 23.1 | 24.2 | 26.5 | 31.0 |
| Q4_1 | 19.22 GiB | 20.4 | 20.7 | 21.2 | 22.4 | 24.6 | 29.1 |
| Q4_K_M | 18.49 GiB | 19.7 | 19.9 | 20.5 | 21.6 | 23.9 | 28.4 |
| Q4_0 | 17.43 GiB | 18.6 | 18.9 | 19.5 | 20.6 | 22.8 | 27.3 |
| IQ4_NL | 17.40 GiB | 18.6 | 18.9 | 19.4 | 20.5 | 22.8 | 27.3 |
| IQ4_XS | 16.50 GiB | 17.7 | 18.0 | 18.5 | 19.6 | 21.9 | 26.4 |
| Q3_K_L | 16.06 GiB | 17.2 | 17.5 | 18.1 | 19.2 | 21.5 | 26.0 |
| Q3_K_M | 14.84 GiB | 16.0 | 16.3 | 16.9 | 18.0 | 20.2 | 24.7 |
| Q3_K_S | 13.40 GiB | 14.6 | 14.9 | 15.4 | 16.6 | 18.8 | 23.3 |
| UD-IQ3_XXS | 12.16 GiB | 13.3 | 13.6 | 14.2 | 15.3 | 17.6 | 22.1 |
| Q2_K_L | 11.64 GiB | 12.8 | 13.1 | 13.7 | 14.8 | 17.0 | 21.5 |
| Q2_K | 11.47 GiB | 12.6 | 12.9 | 13.5 | 14.6 | 16.9 | 21.4 |
| UD-IQ2_M | 10.71 GiB | 11.9 | 12.2 | 12.7 | 13.9 | 16.1 | 20.6 |
| UD-IQ2_XXS | 8.70 GiB | 9.9 | 10.2 | 10.7 | 11.8 | 14.1 | 18.6 |
| UD-IQ1_M | 7.73 GiB | 8.9 | 9.2 | 9.8 | 10.9 | 13.1 | 17.6 |
| UD-IQ1_S | 7.16 GiB | 8.3 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 10.3 | 12.6 | 17.1 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 32,768-token window rather than the full context.