Can I run Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct on a RTX A2000?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct fits RTX A2000 at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 4.38 GiB in weights alone, against 5.58 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q8_0 | 29.25 GiB | 30.7 | 31.1 | 31.9 | 33.5 | 36.7 | 43.0 |
| F16 | 27.52 GiB | 29.0 | 29.4 | 30.2 | 31.8 | 34.9 | 41.3 |
| Q6_K | 22.58 GiB | 24.0 | 24.4 | 25.2 | 26.8 | 30.0 | 36.4 |
| Q5_K_M | 19.57 GiB | 21.0 | 21.4 | 22.2 | 23.8 | 27.0 | 33.4 |
| Q5_0 | 19.12 GiB | 20.6 | 21.0 | 21.8 | 23.4 | 26.5 | 32.9 |
| Q6_K_L | 11.64 GiB | 13.1 | 13.5 | 14.3 | 15.9 | 19.1 | 25.4 |
| Q5_K_L | 10.23 GiB | 11.7 | 12.1 | 12.9 | 14.5 | 17.7 | 24.0 |
| Q5_K_S | 9.56 GiB | 11.0 | 11.4 | 12.2 | 13.8 | 17.0 | 23.4 |
| Q4_K_L | 8.91 GiB | 10.4 | 10.8 | 11.5 | 13.1 | 16.3 | 22.7 |
| Q4_K_M | 8.37 GiB | 9.8 | 10.2 | 11.0 | 12.6 | 15.8 | 22.2 |
| Q4_K_S | 7.98 GiB | 9.4 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 21.8 |
| IQ4_NL | 7.96 GiB | 9.4 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 21.8 |
| Q4_0 | 7.96 GiB | 9.4 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 21.8 |
| IQ4_XS | 7.56 GiB | 9.0 | 9.4 | 10.2 | 11.8 | 15.0 | 21.4 |
| Q3_K_L | 7.38 GiB | 8.8 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 11.6 | 14.8 | 21.2 |
| Q3_K_M | 6.84 GiB | 8.3 | 8.7 | 9.5 | 11.1 | 14.3 | 20.6 |
| IQ3_M | 6.44 GiB | 7.9 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 10.7 | 13.9 | 20.2 |
| Q3_K_S | 6.20 GiB | 7.6 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 10.4 | 13.6 | 20.0 |
| Q2_K_L | 6.08 GiB | 7.5 | 7.9 | 8.7 | 10.3 | 13.5 | 19.9 |
| IQ3_XS | 5.94 GiB | 7.4 | 7.8 | 8.6 | 10.2 | 13.4 | 19.7 |
| Q2_K | 5.37 GiB | 6.8 | 7.2 | 8.0 | 9.6 | 12.8 | 19.2 |
| IQ2_M | 4.99 GiB | 6.4 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 9.2 | 12.4 | 18.8 |
| IQ2_S | 4.66 GiB | 6.1 | 6.5 | 7.3 | 8.9 | 12.1 | 18.5 |
| IQ2_XS | 4.38 GiB | 5.8 | 6.2 | 7.0 | 8.6 | 11.8 | 18.2 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 131,072-token window rather than the full context.