Can I run Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-abliterated-v2 on a GeForce RTX 3050?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-abliterated-v2 fits GeForce RTX 3050 at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 5.37 GiB in weights alone, against 5.58 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q8_0 | 14.62 GiB | 15.9 | 16.3 | 17.1 | 18.7 | 21.8 | 28.2 |
| Q6_K | 11.29 GiB | 12.5 | 12.9 | 13.7 | 15.3 | 18.5 | 24.9 |
| Q5_K_M | 9.79 GiB | 11.0 | 11.4 | 12.2 | 13.8 | 17.0 | 23.4 |
| Q5_K_S | 9.56 GiB | 10.8 | 11.2 | 12.0 | 13.6 | 16.8 | 23.2 |
| Q4_K_M | 8.37 GiB | 9.6 | 10.0 | 10.8 | 12.4 | 15.6 | 22.0 |
| Q4_K_S | 7.98 GiB | 9.2 | 9.6 | 10.4 | 12.0 | 15.2 | 21.6 |
| IQ4_XS | 7.62 GiB | 8.9 | 9.3 | 10.1 | 11.7 | 14.8 | 21.2 |
| Q3_K_L | 7.38 GiB | 8.6 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 11.4 | 14.6 | 21.0 |
| Q3_K_M | 6.84 GiB | 8.1 | 8.5 | 9.3 | 10.9 | 14.1 | 20.4 |
| Q3_K_S | 6.20 GiB | 7.4 | 7.8 | 8.6 | 10.2 | 13.4 | 19.8 |
| Q2_K | 5.37 GiB | 6.6 | 7.0 | 7.8 | 9.4 | 12.6 | 19.0 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 131,072-token window rather than the full context.