Can I run Olmo-3-32B-Think on a Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of Olmo-3-32B-Think fits Radeon RX 6500 XT at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 6.75 GiB in weights alone, against 3.72 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 60.04 GiB | 61.6 | 61.8 | 62.0 | 62.6 | 63.6 | 65.7 |
| Q8_0 | 31.90 GiB | 33.4 | 33.6 | 33.9 | 34.4 | 35.5 | 37.6 |
| Q6_K_L | 24.86 GiB | 26.4 | 26.6 | 26.8 | 27.4 | 28.4 | 30.6 |
| Q6_K | 24.63 GiB | 26.2 | 26.3 | 26.6 | 27.1 | 28.2 | 30.3 |
| Q5_K_L | 21.58 GiB | 23.1 | 23.3 | 23.6 | 24.1 | 25.2 | 27.3 |
| Q5_K_M | 21.29 GiB | 22.8 | 23.0 | 23.3 | 23.8 | 24.9 | 27.0 |
| Q5_K_S | 20.71 GiB | 22.2 | 22.4 | 22.7 | 23.2 | 24.3 | 26.4 |
| Q4_1 | 18.86 GiB | 20.4 | 20.6 | 20.8 | 21.4 | 22.4 | 24.6 |
| Q4_K_L | 18.50 GiB | 20.0 | 20.2 | 20.5 | 21.0 | 22.1 | 24.2 |
| Q4_K_M | 18.14 GiB | 19.7 | 19.9 | 20.1 | 20.7 | 21.7 | 23.8 |
| Q4_K_S | 17.15 GiB | 18.7 | 18.9 | 19.1 | 19.7 | 20.7 | 22.8 |
| Q4_0 | 17.08 GiB | 18.6 | 18.8 | 19.1 | 19.6 | 20.7 | 22.8 |
| IQ4_NL | 17.06 GiB | 18.6 | 18.8 | 19.0 | 19.6 | 20.6 | 22.8 |
| IQ4_XS | 16.16 GiB | 17.7 | 17.9 | 18.1 | 18.7 | 19.7 | 21.9 |
| Q3_K_L | 15.75 GiB | 17.3 | 17.5 | 17.7 | 18.3 | 19.3 | 21.4 |
| Q3_K_M | 14.53 GiB | 16.1 | 16.2 | 16.5 | 17.0 | 18.1 | 20.2 |
| IQ3_M | 13.48 GiB | 15.0 | 15.2 | 15.5 | 16.0 | 17.1 | 19.2 |
| Q3_K_S | 13.09 GiB | 14.6 | 14.8 | 15.1 | 15.6 | 16.7 | 18.8 |
| IQ3_XS | 12.45 GiB | 14.0 | 14.2 | 14.4 | 15.0 | 16.0 | 18.1 |
| UD-IQ3_XXS | 11.78 GiB | 13.3 | 13.5 | 13.8 | 14.3 | 15.4 | 17.5 |
| IQ3_XXS | 11.68 GiB | 13.2 | 13.4 | 13.7 | 14.2 | 15.2 | 17.4 |
| Q2_K_L | 11.65 GiB | 13.2 | 13.4 | 13.6 | 14.2 | 15.2 | 17.3 |
| Q2_K | 11.18 GiB | 12.7 | 12.9 | 13.2 | 13.7 | 14.8 | 16.9 |
| UD-IQ2_M | 10.29 GiB | 11.8 | 12.0 | 12.3 | 12.8 | 13.9 | 16.0 |
| IQ2_M | 10.21 GiB | 11.7 | 11.9 | 12.2 | 12.7 | 13.8 | 15.9 |
| IQ2_S | 9.40 GiB | 10.9 | 11.1 | 11.4 | 11.9 | 13.0 | 15.1 |
| IQ2_XS | 9.02 GiB | 10.5 | 10.7 | 11.0 | 11.5 | 12.6 | 14.7 |
| UD-IQ2_XXS | 8.30 GiB | 9.8 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 11.9 | 14.0 |
| UD-IQ1_M | 7.33 GiB | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 10.9 | 13.0 |
| UD-IQ1_S | 6.75 GiB | 8.3 | 8.5 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 10.3 | 12.4 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 4,096-token window rather than the full context.