Can I run Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct on a GeForce RTX 3050?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct fits GeForce RTX 3050 at any context we compute, with q4_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 6.75 GiB in weights alone, against 5.58 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 60.04 GiB | 61.2 | 61.3 | 61.5 | 61.7 | 62.3 | 63.4 |
| Q8_0 | 31.90 GiB | 33.1 | 33.2 | 33.3 | 33.6 | 34.2 | 35.3 |
| Q6_K_L | 24.86 GiB | 26.0 | 26.1 | 26.3 | 26.6 | 27.1 | 28.2 |
| Q6_K | 24.63 GiB | 25.8 | 25.9 | 26.0 | 26.3 | 26.9 | 28.0 |
| Q5_K_L | 21.58 GiB | 22.8 | 22.9 | 23.0 | 23.3 | 23.8 | 25.0 |
| Q5_K_M | 21.29 GiB | 22.5 | 22.6 | 22.7 | 23.0 | 23.5 | 24.7 |
| Q5_K_S | 20.71 GiB | 21.9 | 22.0 | 22.1 | 22.4 | 23.0 | 24.1 |
| Q4_1 | 18.86 GiB | 20.0 | 20.1 | 20.3 | 20.6 | 21.1 | 22.2 |
| Q4_K_L | 18.50 GiB | 19.7 | 19.8 | 19.9 | 20.2 | 20.8 | 21.9 |
| Q4_K_M | 18.14 GiB | 19.3 | 19.4 | 19.6 | 19.8 | 20.4 | 21.5 |
| Q4_K_S | 17.15 GiB | 18.3 | 18.4 | 18.6 | 18.8 | 19.4 | 20.5 |
| Q4_0 | 17.08 GiB | 18.3 | 18.4 | 18.5 | 18.8 | 19.3 | 20.5 |
| IQ4_NL | 17.06 GiB | 18.2 | 18.3 | 18.5 | 18.8 | 19.3 | 20.4 |
| IQ4_XS | 16.16 GiB | 17.3 | 17.4 | 17.6 | 17.9 | 18.4 | 19.5 |
| Q3_K_L | 15.75 GiB | 16.9 | 17.0 | 17.2 | 17.4 | 18.0 | 19.1 |
| Q3_K_M | 14.53 GiB | 15.7 | 15.8 | 15.9 | 16.2 | 16.8 | 17.9 |
| IQ3_M | 13.48 GiB | 14.7 | 14.8 | 14.9 | 15.2 | 15.7 | 16.9 |
| Q3_K_S | 13.09 GiB | 14.3 | 14.4 | 14.5 | 14.8 | 15.4 | 16.5 |
| IQ3_XS | 12.45 GiB | 13.6 | 13.7 | 13.9 | 14.2 | 14.7 | 15.8 |
| UD-IQ3_XXS | 11.78 GiB | 13.0 | 13.1 | 13.2 | 13.5 | 14.0 | 15.2 |
| IQ3_XXS | 11.68 GiB | 12.9 | 13.0 | 13.1 | 13.4 | 13.9 | 15.1 |
| Q2_K_L | 11.65 GiB | 12.8 | 12.9 | 13.1 | 13.3 | 13.9 | 15.0 |
| Q2_K | 11.18 GiB | 12.4 | 12.5 | 12.6 | 12.9 | 13.4 | 14.6 |
| UD-IQ2_M | 10.29 GiB | 11.5 | 11.6 | 11.7 | 12.0 | 12.5 | 13.7 |
| IQ2_M | 10.21 GiB | 11.4 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 11.9 | 12.5 | 13.6 |
| IQ2_S | 9.40 GiB | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 11.7 | 12.8 |
| IQ2_XS | 9.02 GiB | 10.2 | 10.3 | 10.4 | 10.7 | 11.3 | 12.4 |
| UD-IQ2_XXS | 8.30 GiB | 9.5 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 10.6 | 11.7 |
| IQ2_XXS | 8.15 GiB | 9.3 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 9.9 | 10.4 | 11.5 |
| UD-IQ1_M | 7.33 GiB | 8.5 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 9.0 | 9.6 | 10.7 |
| UD-IQ1_S | 6.75 GiB | 7.9 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 10.1 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 4,096-token window rather than the full context.