Can I run Laguna-XS-2.1 on a RTX A1000?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of Laguna-XS-2.1 fits RTX A1000 at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 8.76 GiB in weights alone, against 7.44 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 62.33 GiB | 63.5 | 63.6 | 63.7 | 64.1 | 64.7 | 66.1 |
| Q8_0 | 33.15 GiB | 34.3 | 34.4 | 34.5 | 34.9 | 35.5 | 36.9 |
| Q6_K_L | 27.14 GiB | 28.3 | 28.4 | 28.5 | 28.9 | 29.5 | 30.9 |
| Q6_K | 27.04 GiB | 28.2 | 28.3 | 28.4 | 28.8 | 29.4 | 30.8 |
| Q5_K_L | 22.47 GiB | 23.6 | 23.7 | 23.9 | 24.2 | 24.9 | 26.2 |
| Q5_K_M | 22.36 GiB | 23.5 | 23.6 | 23.8 | 24.1 | 24.7 | 26.1 |
| Q5_K_S | 21.63 GiB | 22.8 | 22.9 | 23.0 | 23.4 | 24.0 | 25.3 |
| Q4_1 | 19.73 GiB | 20.9 | 21.0 | 21.1 | 21.5 | 22.1 | 23.4 |
| Q4_K_L | 19.28 GiB | 20.4 | 20.5 | 20.7 | 21.0 | 21.7 | 23.0 |
| Q4_K_M | 19.14 GiB | 20.3 | 20.4 | 20.5 | 20.9 | 21.5 | 22.9 |
| Q4_K_S | 18.42 GiB | 19.6 | 19.7 | 19.8 | 20.1 | 20.8 | 22.1 |
| IQ4_NL | 17.89 GiB | 19.0 | 19.1 | 19.3 | 19.6 | 20.3 | 21.6 |
| Q4_0 | 17.89 GiB | 19.0 | 19.1 | 19.3 | 19.6 | 20.3 | 21.6 |
| IQ4_XS | 16.96 GiB | 18.1 | 18.2 | 18.4 | 18.7 | 19.4 | 20.7 |
| IQ3_M | 15.16 GiB | 16.3 | 16.4 | 16.6 | 16.9 | 17.6 | 18.9 |
| Q3_K_L | 15.02 GiB | 16.2 | 16.3 | 16.4 | 16.7 | 17.4 | 18.7 |
| Q3_K_M | 14.51 GiB | 15.7 | 15.7 | 15.9 | 16.2 | 16.9 | 18.2 |
| IQ3_XS | 14.49 GiB | 15.6 | 15.7 | 15.9 | 16.2 | 16.9 | 18.2 |
| Q3_K_S | 13.87 GiB | 15.0 | 15.1 | 15.3 | 15.6 | 16.3 | 17.6 |
| IQ3_XXS | 13.30 GiB | 14.4 | 14.5 | 14.7 | 15.0 | 15.7 | 17.0 |
| Q2_K_L | 11.51 GiB | 12.7 | 12.7 | 12.9 | 13.2 | 13.9 | 15.2 |
| Q2_K | 11.32 GiB | 12.5 | 12.6 | 12.7 | 13.0 | 13.7 | 15.0 |
| IQ2_M | 10.84 GiB | 12.0 | 12.1 | 12.2 | 12.6 | 13.2 | 14.6 |
| IQ2_S | 9.89 GiB | 11.0 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 12.3 | 13.6 |
| IQ2_XS | 9.67 GiB | 10.8 | 10.9 | 11.1 | 11.4 | 12.1 | 13.4 |
| IQ2_XXS | 8.76 GiB | 9.9 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 11.1 | 12.5 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 512-token window rather than the full context.