Can I run Laguna-XS-2.1 on a Apple M5?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of Laguna-XS-2.1 fits Apple M5 at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 8.76 GiB in weights alone, against 8.37 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 62.33 GiB | 63.0 | 63.1 | 63.3 | 63.6 | 64.3 | 65.6 |
| Q8_0 | 33.15 GiB | 33.8 | 33.9 | 34.1 | 34.4 | 35.1 | 36.4 |
| Q6_K_L | 27.14 GiB | 27.8 | 27.9 | 28.1 | 28.4 | 29.1 | 30.4 |
| Q6_K | 27.04 GiB | 27.7 | 27.8 | 28.0 | 28.3 | 29.0 | 30.3 |
| Q5_K_L | 22.47 GiB | 23.2 | 23.3 | 23.4 | 23.8 | 24.4 | 25.7 |
| Q5_K_M | 22.36 GiB | 23.1 | 23.1 | 23.3 | 23.6 | 24.3 | 25.6 |
| Q5_K_S | 21.63 GiB | 22.3 | 22.4 | 22.6 | 22.9 | 23.6 | 24.9 |
| Q4_1 | 19.73 GiB | 20.4 | 20.5 | 20.7 | 21.0 | 21.7 | 23.0 |
| Q4_K_L | 19.28 GiB | 20.0 | 20.1 | 20.2 | 20.6 | 21.2 | 22.5 |
| Q4_K_M | 19.14 GiB | 19.8 | 19.9 | 20.1 | 20.4 | 21.1 | 22.4 |
| Q4_K_S | 18.42 GiB | 19.1 | 19.2 | 19.4 | 19.7 | 20.4 | 21.7 |
| IQ4_NL | 17.89 GiB | 18.6 | 18.7 | 18.8 | 19.2 | 19.8 | 21.2 |
| Q4_0 | 17.89 GiB | 18.6 | 18.7 | 18.8 | 19.2 | 19.8 | 21.2 |
| IQ4_XS | 16.96 GiB | 17.7 | 17.7 | 17.9 | 18.2 | 18.9 | 20.2 |
| IQ3_M | 15.16 GiB | 15.9 | 15.9 | 16.1 | 16.4 | 17.1 | 18.4 |
| Q3_K_L | 15.02 GiB | 15.7 | 15.8 | 16.0 | 16.3 | 17.0 | 18.3 |
| Q3_K_M | 14.51 GiB | 15.2 | 15.3 | 15.5 | 15.8 | 16.4 | 17.8 |
| IQ3_XS | 14.49 GiB | 15.2 | 15.3 | 15.4 | 15.8 | 16.4 | 17.8 |
| Q3_K_S | 13.87 GiB | 14.6 | 14.6 | 14.8 | 15.1 | 15.8 | 17.1 |
| IQ3_XXS | 13.30 GiB | 14.0 | 14.1 | 14.2 | 14.6 | 15.2 | 16.6 |
| Q2_K_L | 11.51 GiB | 12.2 | 12.3 | 12.5 | 12.8 | 13.5 | 14.8 |
| Q2_K | 11.32 GiB | 12.0 | 12.1 | 12.3 | 12.6 | 13.3 | 14.6 |
| IQ2_M | 10.84 GiB | 11.5 | 11.6 | 11.8 | 12.1 | 12.8 | 14.1 |
| IQ2_S | 9.89 GiB | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 11.2 | 11.8 | 13.2 |
| IQ2_XS | 9.67 GiB | 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 11.6 | 12.9 |
| IQ2_XXS | 8.76 GiB | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 10.7 | 12.0 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 512-token window rather than the full context.