Can I run Kimi-Dev-72B on a Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of Kimi-Dev-72B fits Radeon RX 6500 XT at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 21.47 GiB in weights alone, against 3.72 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 135.44 GiB | 137.1 | 137.8 | 139.1 | 141.8 | 147.1 | 157.7 |
| Q8_0 | 71.96 GiB | 73.7 | 74.3 | 75.6 | 78.3 | 83.6 | 94.2 |
| Q6_K | 59.93 GiB | 61.6 | 62.3 | 63.6 | 66.3 | 71.6 | 82.2 |
| Q4_1 | 42.56 GiB | 44.3 | 44.9 | 46.2 | 48.9 | 54.2 | 64.8 |
| Q4_0 | 38.54 GiB | 40.2 | 40.9 | 42.2 | 44.9 | 50.2 | 60.8 |
| IQ4_NL | 38.48 GiB | 40.2 | 40.8 | 42.2 | 44.8 | 50.1 | 60.8 |
| IQ4_XS | 37.02 GiB | 38.7 | 39.4 | 40.7 | 43.4 | 48.7 | 59.3 |
| Q3_K_M | 35.11 GiB | 36.8 | 37.5 | 38.8 | 41.5 | 46.8 | 57.4 |
| Q3_K_S | 32.12 GiB | 33.8 | 34.5 | 35.8 | 38.5 | 43.8 | 54.4 |
| UD-IQ3_XXS | 29.67 GiB | 31.4 | 32.0 | 33.4 | 36.0 | 41.3 | 51.9 |
| UD-IQ2_M | 27.56 GiB | 29.3 | 29.9 | 31.3 | 33.9 | 39.2 | 49.8 |
| UD-IQ2_XXS | 23.94 GiB | 25.6 | 26.3 | 27.6 | 30.3 | 35.6 | 46.2 |
| UD-IQ1_M | 22.35 GiB | 24.0 | 24.7 | 26.0 | 28.7 | 34.0 | 44.6 |
| UD-IQ1_S | 21.47 GiB | 23.2 | 23.8 | 25.2 | 27.8 | 33.1 | 43.7 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 131,072-token window rather than the full context.