Does gpt-oss-120b fit in 12GB of VRAM?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of gpt-oss-120b fits 12GB card at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 58.27 GiB in weights alone, against 11.16 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F16 | 60.88 GiB | 61.8 | 61.8 | 62.0 | 62.3 | 62.9 | 64.1 |
| Q8_0 | 59.03 GiB | 59.9 | 60.0 | 60.1 | 60.4 | 61.0 | 62.2 |
| MXFP4 | 59.03 GiB | 59.9 | 60.0 | 60.1 | 60.4 | 61.0 | 62.2 |
| Q6_K | 58.94 GiB | 59.8 | 59.9 | 60.0 | 60.3 | 60.9 | 62.1 |
| Q5_K_M | 58.57 GiB | 59.4 | 59.5 | 59.7 | 60.0 | 60.6 | 61.8 |
| Q5_K_S | 58.56 GiB | 59.4 | 59.5 | 59.7 | 60.0 | 60.6 | 61.8 |
| Q2_K_L | 58.54 GiB | 59.4 | 59.5 | 59.6 | 59.9 | 60.5 | 61.7 |
| Q4_K_M | 58.46 GiB | 59.3 | 59.4 | 59.6 | 59.9 | 60.5 | 61.7 |
| Q4_K_S | 58.45 GiB | 59.3 | 59.4 | 59.6 | 59.8 | 60.4 | 61.6 |
| Q4_1 | 58.41 GiB | 59.3 | 59.4 | 59.5 | 59.8 | 60.4 | 61.6 |
| Q3_K_M | 58.33 GiB | 59.2 | 59.3 | 59.4 | 59.7 | 60.3 | 61.5 |
| Q4_0 | 58.32 GiB | 59.2 | 59.3 | 59.4 | 59.7 | 60.3 | 61.5 |
| Q2_K | 58.27 GiB | 59.2 | 59.2 | 59.4 | 59.7 | 60.3 | 61.5 |
| Q3_K_S | 58.27 GiB | 59.1 | 59.2 | 59.4 | 59.7 | 60.3 | 61.5 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why there are no speeds on this page
A capacity is not a card. Whether a model fits depends only on memory, so every figure above holds for any 12GB accelerator. How fast it runs depends on memory bandwidth, which varies several-fold between cards of the same capacity — so putting a tokens-per-second number here would be inventing one. Pick a specific card from hardware and the speed column appears.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 128-token window rather than the full context.