Can I run GLM-5 on a Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of GLM-5 fits Radeon RX 6500 XT at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 164.05 GiB in weights alone, against 3.72 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 1404.42 GiB | 1405.5 | 1405.7 | 1406.1 | 1406.8 | 1408.3 | 1411.2 |
| Q8_0 | 746.31 GiB | 747.4 | 747.6 | 748.0 | 748.7 | 750.2 | 753.1 |
| Q6_K | 576.84 GiB | 578.0 | 578.2 | 578.5 | 579.2 | 580.7 | 583.6 |
| Q5_K_M | 498.42 GiB | 499.5 | 499.7 | 500.1 | 500.8 | 502.3 | 505.2 |
| Q5_K_S | 484.04 GiB | 485.2 | 485.4 | 485.7 | 486.4 | 487.9 | 490.8 |
| Q4_1 | 440.24 GiB | 441.4 | 441.6 | 441.9 | 442.6 | 444.1 | 447.0 |
| Q4_K_M | 424.57 GiB | 425.7 | 425.9 | 426.2 | 427.0 | 428.4 | 431.3 |
| Q4_K_S | 398.95 GiB | 400.1 | 400.3 | 400.6 | 401.4 | 402.8 | 405.7 |
| Q4_0 | 397.81 GiB | 398.9 | 399.1 | 399.5 | 400.2 | 401.7 | 404.6 |
| IQ4_NL | 396.67 GiB | 397.8 | 398.0 | 398.3 | 399.1 | 400.5 | 403.4 |
| IQ4_XS | 375.23 GiB | 376.4 | 376.5 | 376.9 | 377.6 | 379.1 | 382.0 |
| Q3_K_M | 335.56 GiB | 336.7 | 336.9 | 337.2 | 338.0 | 339.4 | 342.3 |
| Q3_K_S | 303.87 GiB | 305.0 | 305.2 | 305.5 | 306.3 | 307.7 | 310.6 |
| UD-IQ3_XXS | 283.62 GiB | 284.8 | 284.9 | 285.3 | 286.0 | 287.5 | 290.4 |
| Q2_K_L | 257.21 GiB | 258.3 | 258.5 | 258.9 | 259.6 | 261.1 | 264.0 |
| Q2_K | 257.00 GiB | 258.1 | 258.3 | 258.7 | 259.4 | 260.9 | 263.8 |
| UD-IQ2_M | 237.27 GiB | 238.4 | 238.6 | 238.9 | 239.7 | 241.1 | 244.0 |
| UD-IQ2_XXS | 224.52 GiB | 225.6 | 225.8 | 226.2 | 226.9 | 228.4 | 231.3 |
| UD-IQ1_M | 208.48 GiB | 209.6 | 209.8 | 210.2 | 210.9 | 212.3 | 215.3 |
| UD-IQ1_S | 189.71 GiB | 190.8 | 191.0 | 191.4 | 192.1 | 193.6 | 196.5 |
| UD-TQ1_0 | 164.05 GiB | 165.2 | 165.4 | 165.7 | 166.5 | 167.9 | 170.8 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, this model uses latent attention and allocates no V cache at all, so any formula reading num_key_value_heads overstates its cache by more than an order of magnitude.