Can I run Gemma-4-31B-StyleTune on a Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of Gemma-4-31B-StyleTune fits Radeon RX 6500 XT at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 7.10 GiB in weights alone, against 3.72 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 59.82 GiB | 61.8 | 62.1 | 62.8 | 64.1 | 66.7 | 72.0 |
| Q8_0 | 31.79 GiB | 33.7 | 34.1 | 34.7 | 36.0 | 38.7 | 44.0 |
| Q6_K_L | 26.60 GiB | 28.5 | 28.9 | 29.5 | 30.9 | 33.5 | 38.8 |
| Q6_K | 25.97 GiB | 27.9 | 28.2 | 28.9 | 30.2 | 32.9 | 38.2 |
| I1-Q6_K | 24.55 GiB | 26.5 | 26.8 | 27.5 | 28.8 | 31.5 | 36.8 |
| Q5_K_L | 22.77 GiB | 24.7 | 25.0 | 25.7 | 27.0 | 29.7 | 35.0 |
| Q5_K_M | 21.96 GiB | 23.9 | 24.2 | 24.9 | 26.2 | 28.9 | 34.2 |
| I1-Q5_K_M | 21.25 GiB | 23.2 | 23.5 | 24.2 | 25.5 | 28.2 | 33.5 |
| Q5_K_S | 20.93 GiB | 22.9 | 23.2 | 23.9 | 25.2 | 27.8 | 33.2 |
| I1-Q5_K_S | 20.75 GiB | 22.7 | 23.0 | 23.7 | 25.0 | 27.7 | 33.0 |
| Q4_K_L | 19.96 GiB | 21.9 | 22.2 | 22.9 | 24.2 | 26.9 | 32.2 |
| Q4_1 | 19.23 GiB | 21.2 | 21.5 | 22.2 | 23.5 | 26.1 | 31.5 |
| Q4_K_M | 18.99 GiB | 20.9 | 21.3 | 21.9 | 23.3 | 25.9 | 31.2 |
| I1-Q4_1 | 18.96 GiB | 20.9 | 21.2 | 21.9 | 23.2 | 25.9 | 31.2 |
| Q5_K | 18.17 GiB | 20.1 | 20.4 | 21.1 | 22.4 | 25.1 | 30.4 |
| I1-Q4_K_M | 18.14 GiB | 20.1 | 20.4 | 21.1 | 22.4 | 25.1 | 30.4 |
| Q4_K_S | 17.68 GiB | 19.6 | 20.0 | 20.6 | 21.9 | 24.6 | 29.9 |
| Q4_0 | 17.57 GiB | 19.5 | 19.8 | 20.5 | 21.8 | 24.5 | 29.8 |
| IQ4_NL | 17.53 GiB | 19.5 | 19.8 | 20.5 | 21.8 | 24.4 | 29.8 |
| I1-Q4_K_S | 17.28 GiB | 19.2 | 19.5 | 20.2 | 21.5 | 24.2 | 29.5 |
| I1-Q4_0 | 17.22 GiB | 19.2 | 19.5 | 20.2 | 21.5 | 24.1 | 29.5 |
| IQ4_XS | 16.67 GiB | 18.6 | 18.9 | 19.6 | 20.9 | 23.6 | 28.9 |
| I1-IQ4_XS | 16.28 GiB | 18.2 | 18.6 | 19.2 | 20.5 | 23.2 | 28.5 |
| Q3_K_L | 16.22 GiB | 18.2 | 18.5 | 19.2 | 20.5 | 23.1 | 28.4 |
| I1-Q3_K_L | 16.05 GiB | 18.0 | 18.3 | 19.0 | 20.3 | 23.0 | 28.3 |
| Q3_K_M | 15.39 GiB | 17.3 | 17.7 | 18.3 | 19.6 | 22.3 | 27.6 |
| I1-Q3_K_M | 14.80 GiB | 16.7 | 17.1 | 17.7 | 19.1 | 21.7 | 27.0 |
| IQ3_M | 14.65 GiB | 16.6 | 16.9 | 17.6 | 18.9 | 21.6 | 26.9 |
| I1-IQ3_M | 14.00 GiB | 15.9 | 16.3 | 16.9 | 18.3 | 20.9 | 26.2 |
| Q3_K_S | 13.91 GiB | 15.8 | 16.2 | 16.8 | 18.2 | 20.8 | 26.1 |
| Q2_K_L | 13.48 GiB | 15.4 | 15.7 | 16.4 | 17.7 | 20.4 | 25.7 |
| IQ3_XS | 13.45 GiB | 15.4 | 15.7 | 16.4 | 17.7 | 20.4 | 25.7 |
| I1-IQ3_S | 13.38 GiB | 15.3 | 15.6 | 16.3 | 17.6 | 20.3 | 25.6 |
| I1-Q3_K_S | 13.38 GiB | 15.3 | 15.6 | 16.3 | 17.6 | 20.3 | 25.6 |
| I1-IQ3_XS | 12.74 GiB | 14.7 | 15.0 | 15.7 | 17.0 | 19.7 | 25.0 |
| IQ3_XXS | 12.65 GiB | 14.6 | 14.9 | 15.6 | 16.9 | 19.6 | 24.9 |
| IQ2_M | 12.34 GiB | 14.3 | 14.6 | 15.3 | 16.6 | 19.3 | 24.6 |
| IQ3_S | 12.22 GiB | 14.2 | 14.5 | 15.2 | 16.5 | 19.1 | 24.5 |
| Q2_K | 12.19 GiB | 14.1 | 14.5 | 15.1 | 16.5 | 19.1 | 24.4 |
| I1-IQ3_XXS | 11.81 GiB | 13.7 | 14.1 | 14.7 | 16.1 | 18.7 | 24.0 |
| I1-Q2_K | 11.53 GiB | 13.5 | 13.8 | 14.5 | 15.8 | 18.4 | 23.8 |
| IQ2_XS | 11.14 GiB | 13.1 | 13.4 | 14.1 | 15.4 | 18.1 | 23.4 |
| I1-IQ2_M | 10.73 GiB | 12.7 | 13.0 | 13.7 | 15.0 | 17.6 | 23.0 |
| I1-Q2_K_S | 10.65 GiB | 12.6 | 12.9 | 13.6 | 14.9 | 17.6 | 22.9 |
| IQ2_XXS | 10.52 GiB | 12.5 | 12.8 | 13.4 | 14.8 | 17.4 | 22.7 |
| I1-IQ2_S | 10.02 GiB | 12.0 | 12.3 | 13.0 | 14.3 | 16.9 | 22.3 |
| I1-IQ2_XS | 9.31 GiB | 11.2 | 11.6 | 12.2 | 13.6 | 16.2 | 21.5 |
| IQ2_S | 9.01 GiB | 10.9 | 11.3 | 11.9 | 13.3 | 15.9 | 21.2 |
| I1-IQ2_XXS | 8.51 GiB | 10.4 | 10.8 | 11.4 | 12.8 | 15.4 | 20.7 |
| I1-IQ1_M | 7.63 GiB | 9.6 | 9.9 | 10.6 | 11.9 | 14.5 | 19.9 |
| I1-IQ1_S | 7.10 GiB | 9.0 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 11.4 | 14.0 | 19.3 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 1,024-token window rather than the full context.