Can I run DeepSeek-V4-Flash-162B on a Apple M5 Pro?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of DeepSeek-V4-Flash-162B fits Apple M5 Pro at any context we compute, with q4_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 55.09 GiB in weights alone, against 33.48 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3_K_M | 72.27 GiB | 73.0 | 73.1 | 73.2 | 73.6 | 74.4 | 75.9 |
| Q2_K | 55.09 GiB | 55.8 | 55.9 | 56.1 | 56.4 | 57.2 | 58.7 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 128-token window rather than the full context.