Can I run DeepSeek-TNG-R1T2-Chimera on a Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of DeepSeek-TNG-R1T2-Chimera fits Radeon RX 6500 XT at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 150.08 GiB in weights alone, against 3.72 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 1250.09 GiB | 1251.2 | 1251.4 | 1251.6 | 1252.2 | 1253.3 | 1255.6 |
| Q8_0 | 664.30 GiB | 665.4 | 665.6 | 665.8 | 666.4 | 667.6 | 669.8 |
| Q6_K | 513.20 GiB | 514.3 | 514.5 | 514.8 | 515.3 | 516.5 | 518.7 |
| Q5_K_M | 443.10 GiB | 444.2 | 444.4 | 444.7 | 445.2 | 446.4 | 448.6 |
| Q5_K_S | 430.46 GiB | 431.6 | 431.7 | 432.0 | 432.6 | 433.7 | 436.0 |
| Q4_1 | 391.52 GiB | 392.6 | 392.8 | 393.1 | 393.6 | 394.8 | 397.1 |
| Q4_K_M | 377.13 GiB | 378.3 | 378.4 | 378.7 | 379.2 | 380.4 | 382.7 |
| Q4_K_S | 354.38 GiB | 355.5 | 355.6 | 355.9 | 356.5 | 357.6 | 359.9 |
| Q4_0 | 353.48 GiB | 354.6 | 354.7 | 355.0 | 355.6 | 356.7 | 359.0 |
| IQ4_NL | 352.58 GiB | 353.7 | 353.8 | 354.1 | 354.7 | 355.8 | 358.1 |
| IQ4_XS | 333.14 GiB | 334.3 | 334.4 | 334.7 | 335.3 | 336.4 | 338.7 |
| Q3_K_M | 297.88 GiB | 299.0 | 299.1 | 299.4 | 300.0 | 301.1 | 303.4 |
| Q3_K_S | 269.83 GiB | 271.0 | 271.1 | 271.4 | 272.0 | 273.1 | 275.4 |
| UD-IQ3_XXS | 254.17 GiB | 255.3 | 255.4 | 255.7 | 256.3 | 257.4 | 259.7 |
| Q2_K_L | 228.17 GiB | 229.3 | 229.4 | 229.7 | 230.3 | 231.4 | 233.7 |
| Q2_K | 227.97 GiB | 229.1 | 229.2 | 229.5 | 230.1 | 231.2 | 233.5 |
| UD-IQ2_M | 212.30 GiB | 213.4 | 213.6 | 213.9 | 214.4 | 215.6 | 217.8 |
| UD-IQ2_XXS | 201.37 GiB | 202.5 | 202.6 | 202.9 | 203.5 | 204.6 | 206.9 |
| UD-IQ1_M | 186.69 GiB | 187.8 | 188.0 | 188.2 | 188.8 | 189.9 | 192.2 |
| UD-IQ1_S | 172.39 GiB | 173.5 | 173.7 | 173.9 | 174.5 | 175.6 | 177.9 |
| UD-TQ1_0 | 150.08 GiB | 151.2 | 151.3 | 151.6 | 152.2 | 153.3 | 155.6 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, this model uses latent attention and allocates no V cache at all, so any formula reading num_key_value_heads overstates its cache by more than an order of magnitude.