Is Qwen3.8-27B or Glistening-Gem-31B-v1.0 smaller?

Qwen3.8-27B is smaller at Q4_K_M: 15.66 GiB against 17.40 GiB.

Which uses less memory at long context?

Qwen3.8-27B — its KV cache at 32K context is 3.1x smaller, because of how its attention layers cache.

Model comparison

Qwen3.8-27B vs Glistening-Gem-31B-v1.0

At Q4_K_M, Qwen3.8-27B is the smaller download — 16,810,714,336 bytes against 18,687,063,232. At long context the gap widens: Qwen3.8-27B's KV cache at 32K is 3.1× smaller, which usually matters more than the difference in weights.

From the file· summed bytes, KV per layer

Side by side

	Qwen3.8-27B	Glistening-Gem-31B-v1.0
Parameters	27.8B	31.3B
Architecture	qwen35	gemma4
Layers	64	60
Native context	262,144	262,144
Mixture of experts	no	no
Quantizations published	22	54
Smallest quantization	8.39 GiB	6.67 GiB
Q4_K_M	15.66 GiB	17.40 GiB
Licence	apache-2.0	—

KV cache by context

the term that decides long-context viability

Context	Qwen3.8-27B	Glistening-Gem-31B-v1.0	Ratio
4,096	0.25 GiB	1.80 GiB	7.18×
8,192	0.50 GiB	2.42 GiB	4.84×
16,384	1.00 GiB	3.67 GiB	3.67×
32,768	2.00 GiB	6.17 GiB	3.09×
65,536	4.00 GiB	11.17 GiB	2.79×
131,072	8.00 GiB	21.17 GiB	2.65×