Is L3.2-Rogue-Creative-Instruct-Uncensored-Abliterated-7B or gemma-4-E4B-it smaller?

L3.2-Rogue-Creative-Instruct-Uncensored-Abliterated-7B is smaller at Q4_K_M: 4.27 GiB against 4.64 GiB.

Which uses less memory at long context?

gemma-4-E4B-it — its KV cache at 32K context is 16.6x smaller, because of how its attention layers cache.

Model comparison

L3.2-Rogue-Creative-Instruct-Uncensored-Abliterated-7B vs gemma-4-E4B-it

At Q4_K_M, L3.2-Rogue-Creative-Instruct-Uncensored-Abliterated-7B is the smaller download — 4,588,966,592 bytes against 4,977,171,584. At long context the gap widens: gemma-4-E4B-it's KV cache at 32K is 16.6× smaller, which usually matters more than the difference in weights.

From the file· summed bytes, KV per layer

Side by side

	L3.2-Rogue-Creative-Instruct-Uncensored-Abliterated-7B	gemma-4-E4B-it
Parameters	7.5B	8.0B
Architecture	llama	gemma4
Layers	67	42
Native context	131,072	131,072
Mixture of experts	no	no
Quantizations published	10	36
Smallest quantization	2.73 GiB	3.30 GiB
Q4_K_M	4.27 GiB	4.64 GiB
Licence	apache-2.0	apache-2.0

KV cache by context

the term that decides long-context viability

Context	L3.2-Rogue-Creative-Instruct-Uncensored-Abliterated-7B	gemma-4-E4B-it	Ratio
4,096	1.05 GiB	0.12 GiB	8.51×
8,192	2.09 GiB	0.18 GiB	11.78×
16,384	4.19 GiB	0.29 GiB	14.59×
32,768	8.38 GiB	0.51 GiB	16.56×
65,536	16.75 GiB	0.94 GiB	17.76×
131,072	33.50 GiB	1.82 GiB	18.42×